was thinking earlier about bans on here and i went and checked to see if blue is still banned, and he is. the following is my own opinion but i figured it was worth stating for consideration going into the future. my memory and perception of time aren't good so feel free to correct any inaccuracies i make in this post
as far as i'm aware, blue was banned permanently for inviting bad company here and acting out himself a few times. i don't really know him that well but as far as i saw it while i've been here he just seems like a pretty average person with some quirks that can get tiresome, but not really any more or less so than any other regular here. this might not be entirely accurate on account of my lengthy absence during the summer months but last winter when i was on pretty frequently and i didn't notice any particularly belligerent behavior on his part, in fact i thought he fit in pretty decently. the people he invited were complete fuck ups but it wasn't constant and could've been pretty easily dealt with without such a lengthy ban
my main concern with this ban is the precedent it sets for future moderator behavior. flashii has changed its primary userbase a lot since it began and the amount of regular users here is much higher than it was in the past, which for the most part i think has been a healthy trend without compromising the identity of the website and its culture; however, i do see blue's ban as mostly an indicator of personal prejudice against one individual over the others here
a while back bribob said something along these lines about nabucco or flashii (i forget which) and it stuck with me: "its great how we can have difficult discussions about hard topics we disagree about and still call each other mom at the end of the day." honestly that really encapsulates the essence of how i think an ideal community functions and walks the middle path of a website's userbase. you don't want to cultivate a circlejerking group of lockstep hiveminders that viciously attack those who even slightly disagree with the groupthink, but you also don't want a community of milquetoast uninterested people that are afraid to speak about difficult things for fear of causing offense to others. when everyone understands that all of the people using a website are individuals with different experiences and perspectives and can discuss even the most controversial matters without causing screaming and ragequitting, you can at that point form true friendships and have powerful thought provoking discussions that can impact people's lives in a very positive way
blue's ban, as stated, seems prejudiced for no good reason. he definitely did behave in a way (in regards to inviting pretty belligerent people) that warranted some form of short ban but i think it's been several months at this point, but for what? he made a few bad choices but wasn't himself belligerent or insincere in his speech, not any moreso than any other regulars here. he seemed to be able to discuss things openly and without getting too emotionally involved and i didn't at any point feel like he was being disingenuous
if we're going to ban people because they aren't favored by the ones moderating, or of the more influential members, we're stepping down the slope towards developing circlejerk tendencies. to be plain, i do not care for every single regular member here and some of them really get on my nerves sometimes. this doesn't mean they should be banned or even spoken down to for no reason, not hardly. i know there are people here that dislike me and i definitely get on people's nerves (often intentionally), should i then be banned? i really don't think so
this is all just worth considering, i don't really know the full story but i've just been thinking about it and wanted to poast
(this also applies to zoron btw)
